|
Effects of M/C Pay Withholding on M/Cs vs CSEA and PEF
represented employees in comparable grades: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
The Organization of NYS Management/Confidential Employees, Inc.
(OMCE) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
(5) |
(6) |
(7) |
(8) |
|
|
|
Grade |
MC 2009-10 (JR) |
- 3% W/H |
MC 2010-11 (JR) |
- 7% W/H |
MC 2008-09 (JR) |
2010-11 (JR) |
Difference |
|
|
|
|
|
(Col 2-6) |
|
(Col 4-6) |
|
CSEA PEF |
(Col 7-6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
34,211 |
996 |
35,579 |
2,364 |
33,215 |
34,317 34,317 |
1,102 |
|
|
|
9 |
39,939 |
1,163 |
41,537 |
2,761 |
38,776 |
40,136 40,136 |
1,360 |
|
|
|
11 |
44,496 |
1,296 |
46,276 |
3,076 |
43,200 |
44,762 44,762 |
1,562 |
|
| |
15 |
54,967 |
1,601 |
57,166 |
3,800 |
53,366 |
55,455 55,455 |
2,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
61,289 |
1,785 |
63,741 |
4,237 |
59,504 |
65,190 65,190 |
5,686 |
|
|
|
19 |
64,475 |
1,878 |
67,054 |
4,457 |
62,597 |
68,637 68,637 |
6,040 |
|
|
|
20 |
67,709 |
1,972 |
70,417 |
4,680 |
65,737 |
72,076 72,076 |
6,339 |
|
|
|
21 |
71,206 |
2,074 |
74,054 |
4,922 |
69,132 |
75,862 75,862 |
6,730 |
|
|
|
22 |
74,948 |
2,183 |
77,946 |
5,181 |
72,765 |
79,819 79,819 |
7,054 |
|
| |
23 |
79,778 |
2,324 |
82,969 |
5,515 |
77,454 |
83,954 83,954 |
6,500 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
25/M1 |
87,118 |
2,537 |
90,603 |
6,022 |
84,581 |
92,974 92,974 |
8,393 |
|
|
|
27/M2 |
96,617 |
2,814 |
100,482 |
6,679 |
93,803 |
100,822 |
7,019 |
|
|
|
29/M3 |
107,202 |
3,122 |
111,490 |
7,410 |
104,080 |
111,064 |
6,984 |
|
|
|
31/M4 |
118,410 |
3,449 |
123,146 |
8,185 |
114,961 |
122,354 |
7,393 |
|
|
|
33/M5 |
131,628 |
3,834 |
136,893 |
9,099 |
127,794 |
134,868 |
7,074 |
|
|
|
35/M6 |
145,090 |
4,226 |
150,894 |
10,030 |
140,864 |
148,421 |
7,557 |
|
|
|
37/M7 |
157,473 |
4,587 |
163,772 |
10,886 |
152,886 |
163,033 |
10,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: A further disincentive for PEF/CSEA
employees to take management positions is that, upon transfer or
promotion to M/C, they lose the 3% or 4% |
|
raises they gained in their PEF or CSEA position (OSC payroll
bulletin 702). |
|
|
|
|
Back to News Page |
|
Back to News Page
OMCE Proposal to Restore Lost M/C Compensation
2009-2011
Proposal:
Make M/C designated employees whole for all compensation lost during the
2009-10 fiscal year and the 2010-11 fiscal year proposed loss. This will be
accomplished through the delay of general salary increases, staggering the
payment of performance advances and the use of a deferred pay (lag) initiative.
Assumptions:
- The 2010-11 Executive Budget estimates that $28
Million (all funds)was saved by eliminating the 4% general salary increase
for those deemed management/confidential
- The 2010-11 Executive Budget does appropriate funding
sufficient to accommodate payment of performance advances (steps), longevity
and merit payments at the 2008-09 salary schedule (Sec 130 CSL) rate.
- A one paycheck “rolling” pay date deferred (lag )
payroll would generate approximately $33 -35 Million in savings. (pay date
advances one day for ten consecutive pay periods)
Actions:
·
Effective April 1, 2010 performance advance (steps),
longevity and merit pay will be paid utilizing the 2008-09 salary (CSL section
130/Chapter 10 Laws of 2008) schedule for management confidential employees.
Thos eligible for such performance advances (steps) shall move one step towards
the job rate on that schedule.
(Funding
provided)
·
Effective July 1, 2010 a 2% general salary increase
shall be applied to the 2008-09 M/C salary schedule referenced above.
(Cost= 9 months of $14M
= $10.5 Million)
·
Those now eligible for a performance advance that did not qualify
in April for one shall be granted that performance advance. Those receiving a
performance advance in April shall not receive an additional advance in July,
2010 (Cost
Estimate $.25 Million)
- All M/Cs at the job rate effective July 1, 2010 shall
receive a “Job Rate Advance’ equal to 2% of the job
rate for their position using the salary schedule effective July 1, 2010.
(5000 employees
x $1500 est. avg advance/J.R avg $75000) (Cost
Estimate $7.5 Million)
- In January 1, 2011 a 2% general salary
increase shall be applied to the salary schedule effective July 1, 2010.
(Cost
Estimate=25% of $28 M/1 Qtr.= $7 Million)
- All M/Cs not at the job rate shall receive a
performance advance (step) increase. The receipt of this performance
advance shall not allow individuals to exceed the job rate.
- All those now at the job rate and those
who were eligible and received a “Job Rate Advance” effective
July 1, 2010 shall now receive an additional “Job Rate Advance”.
This “Job Rate Advance” effective January 1, 2011 will
be in addition to the July 2010 schedule “Job Rate Advance”
paid to those eligible employees. This “Job Rate Advance”
effective January 1, 2011 shall be equal to 1% of the job rate for their
position using the salary schedule effective January 1, 2011 and will
become part of the employee’s annual compensation.
(6000
employees x $788 avg advance (Avg J.R. of $78800) (Cost
Estimate= $4.7 Million)
Funding:
·
The 2010 Executive Budget allocates funding for anticipated
performance advances (steps), longevity and merit payments for M/C employees
·
A one pay period (10 days), rolling pay date-deferred (lag)
payroll is proposed for implementation during the last 10 pay periods of the
2010-11 Fiscal Year. Using DOB provided estimates this should yield $33-35
Million in savings
·
The $28 Million in estimated savings from the
planned rescission of the M/C 4% general salary increase
·
$61-65 Million available to fund this initiative
with an estimated cost of $30 Million
Result:
Taxpayers save
$ 31-35 Million
and M/C employees are returned to 95-100% of what Chapter 10 of the Laws of 2008
provides. |